Talks and circles
I have spoken at six Wikimanias on four continents, at Stanford, IFLA, the American Library Association, OpenCon, OCLC, the Cochrane Colloquium, and the Coalition for Networked Information.[31]
- How Wikipedia decides what is trueVerifiability, citations, and the volunteer community that keeps watch over seven million articles. For newsrooms, universities, and anyone who publishes.
- Libraries and the largest encyclopediaWhat The Wikipedia Library learned about access, partnerships, and getting 25,000 editors inside the scholarly record.
- A blueprint for democratic governanceWhy norms do not enforce themselves, and what a day-one plan for government looks like.
- Living well after mental illnessRecovery, the life that comes after it, and how to talk about both without flinching.
Story circles
Listen with attention, speak with intention, and tend to the wellbeing of the whole.
Orality knits persons, individuals into community.
People have more options and feel less whole. Social media promised connection and delivered self-promotion, artifice, and outrage, while isolation and anxiety grew. The web was never built for wellness. Mental health care, meanwhile, has become one more form of solitary self-care, a person on a couch talking to a person in a chair, when the change a society needs happens in small groups where trust is built and shared.[32]
The answer is old and simple. For centuries before we moved our lives online, people gathered in story circles. You set the distractions aside, commit to listening, and tell the story of how you came to be where you are. If you have never sat in one, it may sound slight. It is not. People leave lighter, and closer to each other. I formed the mental health listening circle at the Wikimedia Foundation and run circles for teams, conferences, and communities.[32]
Margaret Mead put it best: never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.